Spiritual men from earliest times have assumed
the goal of man to be God, or the state and
plane of existence that is not of this world.
This world was considered to be one of
transitory being, in which one is having sojourn
either out of one's will or against one's will.
All life dies out after a period of being, which
also is one of continuous change from one
condition to another, so much so one cannot be
said to be identically the same person. Life is
like a stream or river which flows into
nothingness or death. The assumption that every
one takes rebirth after death, renewing the body
after each dissolution at death, has also been
an early axiom of all life. It is true that some
held that on attaining freedom, one goes out at
death never to return again to this kind of
life. This freedom from rebirth has been one of
the most cherished ideals of all spiritual
effort. The frightfulness and misery of this
earthly life has been brought to man's
consciousness by all religious movements, and it
is no wonder that religions have been known to
teach pessimism about this world-life. This
world life cannot be improved, perfected, or
even modified except in small areas of life, and
for some time only. An earthly paradise is
impossible. So the Kingdom of God on Earth is a
dream if not an utopia. Modern ameliorism only
tries to mitigate the misery of the world, to
coat its bitterness with the sugar of love,
sympathy, understanding and social justice.
Though we may correct all the instincts of man,
the greatest defect of the earth-consciousness
would be yet there - the naturalness of death
and its meaninglessness. There have been yogis
who are even now trying to make man immortal by
means of drugs and descent of the Mother's
supramental Grace, or descent of the Supermind
itself. It is wrong to conclude beforehand its
failure just because there have been failures so
far. The other attempt to resign ourselves to
the fate of the river - riverness as one man put
it - to feel, know and live for the instant that
flows into another - unwept, unhonoured and
unsung - this natural resignation that seeks no
immortality, for that is unnatural, is equally
present before us from the days of Heraclitus
and Buddha down to our own days.
Performance and impermanence, and permanence
in impermanence, or impermanence in permanence,
have been the alternatives which men have chosen
at one time or other, and so far liberation
seems to be a going from one to the other, or
the escape from one to the other. Somehow none
of them had been satisfactory to the human mind
restless for a real solution.
It is contended by some that the spiritualism
of Advaita, with its emphasis on the
hierarchical disposition of values of the world
superseded by the ultimate value of
transcendental freedom or moksha, is the goal of
man. The Brahman is the ultimate self (atman) of
man, and all attempts to arrive at it in
manifestation is illusion. Despite its being
pessimistic it is the truth that one will
realize ultimately.
These solutions make it necessary for man to
develop a new kind of vision. It is true to
affirm that our vision is adapted to the ends we
have in view, and in one sense its limitations
are limitations determined by our goals. It is
not usually known that we know or see only that
which we wish to see or know, except in those
cases where Wonder or Danger are present or are
apprehended. This jolt is what we always look
out for as the cause of most philosophising; it
is precisely this 'shock' that lifts man up to
the Vision of his own future; it gives him an
urgent necessity to solve the problem of his own
existence. It is under such a stress or impact
that one begins to sense the need for a newer
vision and approach to the problem of existence.
Such a vision is not enough; it is necessary
also to feel the adequacy of being, of life;
what is called forth is a new impulse to realize
being which seems to have lost its meaning in
the context of the new shock. The philosophic
theory of knowledge seeks only a knowledge - an
explanation which, however comprehensive or
synoptic and systematic, falls short of
explaining or providing a sense of being in the
knowing of this systematic formulation. This is
what modern thinkers have discerned as the
necessity for a philosophy based on the
awareness of existence or being which transcends
knowing. Some have gone to the extent of
affirming that knowing might not lead to being
at all, and therefore one need not have a
philosophy to arrive at this existence or Being.
It is well-known that the attraction of
mysticism lies in its claim to solve the problem
of being or existence. Some proceed on the
assumption that being is a category of personal
existence and, therefore, separative and
individuative of one's existence, marking one
apart from others equally individuated; or
marking one apart from the Whole to which one
really belongs. Existence, in this sense, means
a loss of being (called essence) and loss of
existence would mean the gain of being
(essence). Therefore mystics normally seek the
dissolution or merger or losing of oneself in
the Whole, God or Non-Being. Others, like the
religious, see in the merging or uniting with
the Whole an enhancement of Being or Existence,
or living essence (ujjivana).
Realization means, then, to attain one's
natural condition of being which is felt and
recognized as such, whether it is attained
through mergence in the All or God, or
Non-existence which is understood as the loss or
absence of existence in the sense in which we
all know it, that is, the limited and finite and
morel life that we live. Thus the idealists
innovated a convention of putting (in the
English language) the terms of the ultimate
connotation in capitals viz. Reality, Existence
(or Non-existence) Being (or Non-being), Nirvana
and so on. Some have definitely made out that
since our language cannot adequately speak about
it either in the affirmative or in the negative,
that condition should be deemed incommunicable
through language-signs or by any other signs
whatsoever. It is something to be attained,
felt, or enjoyed, or lived, without the least
idea of separateness from it.
Such a nir-vikalpaka experience is the goal
which a religious mystic seeks. It is the goal
which is the ultimate good for man. The secret
of manifestation can only be known by this
experience and not without it or outside it. To
speak about the nature of light or colour from
the objects it falls upon, or which it shows up,
is perhaps a near way, but it cannot give any
real explanation of the nature of light itself.
In our existence or experience we can never
discern the nature and meaning of ourselves;
that is why we are compelled to go beyond
ourselves and not merely out of ourselves - the
latter process makes knowledge itself a
successful illusion or hallucination. To rise
beyond ourselves and gain that height of Being
is our only way towards real experience and
Being.
But it is a very distant goal, and such a
transcendent state is not aimed at by most
seekers. Any one who sees or feels the call of
the Ultimate would however discern the need for
the highest alone. Some would like to imagine
the highest in the lowest, and become content
with the lowest state itself because it
potentially contains the highest; but it must be
said that this potentiality is quite different
from the potentiality as power to manifest
itself in the lowest fully. The so-called
potentiality of the gross to contain the subtle,
or the effect to contain the cause, is abstract,
and an exhausted condition not capable of
revealing the highest. The potentiality of the
effect in the cause is a dynamic potentiality.
Similarly the Ultimate is veiled (self-veiled?)
in the gross in a different sense than that in
which the potentiality of the gross is veiled in
the subtle. This means that the subtle manifests
the gross or evolves itself in the effect or
gross condition. Sri Ram Chandra states that
this could be expressed in a different way. The
outer contains the inner and as it is opened,
the inner becomes the cover of the outer. God
contains Nature and the individual souls. Just
as the outer is Nature and the inner is the
Ultimate spirit, even so, for each individual
soul, the outer is Nature and the inner is its
own ultimate spirit in its individuated form.
Therefore what is true of the Ultimate and its
manifestation or Nature is equally true of the
individual souls. It is, therefore, necessary
for each individual to recover, or re-cover, or
uncover the inner, and thus make it the outer,
and the outer the inner if it cannot be
abolished. Nature thus becomes veiled, and the
spirit gets unveiled or revealed, and this is
realization of the Ultimate spirit.
The individual soul has therefore to retrace
its steps, and with assiduity and energy
persevere in the unveiling of the spirit within,
either by making the inner the outer, or by
abolishing entirely the outer. The more natural
way is just to invert the whole process by
restoring the primacy of the Spirit and
assigning a subordinate status to Nature. This
happens in two natural ways: first is the
process which automatically reverses the
movement which tends to the maximum of unfolding
or pravrtti; the process by which Nature which
is concealed, or potential in Spirit, is made
the outer visible gross nature, and consequently
spirit appears to be almost completely absent in
Nature in its grossest form. This of course,
does not happen completely, for before this
limit of absolute non-existence of spirit
happens, the process gets automatically
reversed. This principle is known to be present
in all natural phenomena. Similarly it is
perhaps to be assumed that the process of
nivrtti, or reversal of nature, leads to the
more and more subtle states of spirit being
manifested, as grossness seems to be removed, or
turned inward or withdrawn, till the limit of
absolute non-existence of gross Nature is
attained. This is the Zero or nihil or the
Absolute Spirit. The philosophical problem would
be whether the nivrtti also reverses itself
automatically when it tends to the maximum.
Obvious it is that this should be so. The two
are inseparable.
Sri Ram Chandra makes it out that activity
and inactivity go together, and support each
other through out. When activity is fully on,
one begins to feel that there must be an
inactivity which was its cause or prior
condition, and similarly inactivity would become
the aposterori condition of activity as well.
This he explains in his "Towards Infinity"
(Anant ki Or); and that is why philosophers ask
questions about the cause of activity or
creation, whereas religious persons seek peace
or rest or inactivity. If we take it that
activity (rajas) and inactivity (tamas) are
inseparable, and one is the support of the
other, then the samatva (balance) is sattva. In
other words, though Ultimate Liberation is
possible only when one realizes the Ultimate
limit or Absolute nivrtti (inactivity or peace
or santi or zero), it is seen that one can
attain the point of zero which keeps up the
minimum of Nature, and thus one experiences that
ultimate condition whilst yet remaining in this
gross condition, which of course is, astrally
considered, very subtlized or divinized. Thus
that condition of liberation is realizable, even
when remaining in the body. The body however,
for astral vision, is fully subtle and
divinized. That is to say, the gross or material
condition is more and more subtlised or
submerged under the subtlest spiritual
condition.
As pointed out by Sri Ram Chandra, there is
apparently a parallelism between the divine and
the human, the spiritual and the material or the
subtle and the gross; in creation the material
is manifested, and in involution the spiritual
is manifested. It is clear that one is covered
by the other, and when any deep crisis or
necessity arises in material conditions, then,
in the void so created, the spiritual enters,
for Nature abhors a vacuum. Divine intervention
in human affairs occurs under such
circumstances. The aspiration for spiritual
peace is one such crisis, and the hiatus created
by material conditions is the opportunity for
the divine descent in each individual, or in
society itself when such a gap develops in a
community or race and so on. This inbreaking of
the Spirit, which overturns the material and
makes it go under, whilst itself becoming more
and more manifest, reveals the precise
conditions which produce avatars, conversions,
and so on. The reverse is perhaps also the case
when materialistic conditions seem to engulf the
spiritual endeavours. Great spiritual movements
have, after a brief brilliant spell of spiritual
activity, been followed by most materialistic
goals and activities which normally go by the
name of spiritual institutions that preserve and
construct materialistic foundations for them.
That is the reason also why the truly spiritual
beings are averse to founding institutions.
However, it is suggested that if the
spiritual quality or subtle ingressing of the
spiritual into the material moulds it at every
point, a hiatus develops, is made or maintained;
then it is possible to keep the spiritual going
on towards the fullest realization of Ultimate
spirituality.
One of the important discoveries of Sri Ram
Chandra's method of transmission is to maintain
the material or gross form at the minimum,
without being afflicted by either the prarabdha
or sancita samskaras, which are fried up in such
a way that they do not lead to bhoga (experience
of results of karma). In other words, karma
matter is completely removed from effective
checking of the super-conscious life within this
body.
We know from the prayers and hymns of great
sages, who are stated to have arrived at the
jivanmukta state,that they have felt this body
to be a serious bondage to freedom of
consciousness or self. This is true so long as
the consciousness is of the level of abstraction
from the material existence, and there is a
contradiction between the subtle and the gross,
the spiritual and the gross, or where
consciousness itself is defined in terms of this
contradiction. The truly spiritual or purest
thought is such that it is not so: on the other
hand, it appears that the truly ultimate spirit
is not only not opposed to matter, but is also
capable of completely utilizing this gross
matter for its own supreme purposes. This
condition is declared to be the differential
between the Divine and the human: the human
consciousness tied up to matter feels itself
constricted or restricted by matter which it
holds as its own body - albeit temporarily.
The freedom or liberation that one
experiences is surely of the absolute order - a
freedom from all misery, from all bondage to
grossness, from all restrictions and limitations
of rings, sheaths and twists or knots which make
impossible the fullest expression of peace at
all levels. The inactivity or rest or peace is
not, then, a mere negative condition that
restricts the activity, but something that makes
activity itself subtle and most penetrating. Sri
Ram Chandra affirms that this forceless activity
of the Centre, or the Ultimate, is the essence
of peace and perfection, and its
interpenetration and omnipresence is something
that is rendered possible in each individual,
and at any level of existence, by transmission
into the heart of that individual.
Of course it is well-known that Sri Aurobindo
affirmed that the supermind can be brought down
not only in each individual but in the entire
humanity, and that the descent would secure
immortality to each and every individual member
of humanity. But the whole question had been
whether in fact it is efficient, and whether it
has been done. Sri Ram Chandra, by his method of
transmission, has shown that it is possible to
introduce this supreme Consciousness called
Prana - the Breath or life - into the heart of
every one who seeks to attain the Ultimate only,
and not any penultimate being as a poet or
philosopher does.
The great inspirations caused by contact with
great men are mainly due to the unconscious
evocations or opening up of certain centres or
points within the body and not due to any great
inflow of spiritual power that really awakens
one to the Reality or its value for one's very
existence. It is also witnessed in some cases
that one feels attracted once for all to a man
or personality, and becomes his very servant
and, later, his alter ego. These phenomena are
of a different order from the supreme felicity
and peace that develops on the path of
transmission through this supreme Prana. This
breath of breaths, which is at the back of, and
sustaining, all life and existence, is the
supreme prana spoken of by the Upanisads, and is
the First Ksobh or stir of the Ultimate in
creative mood. To bring it down and make it flow
into the abhyasi is possible only to those who
have themselves become one with the Ultimate, or
at least with the First Divine Mind or Ksobh.
The Divine of course, has no "mind", for mind
belongs to the Ksobh or first stir.
Therefore it is that this highest Mind
(superior to the supermind, overmind and other
lesser level minds obviously) can lead one to
the Ultimate condition of being beyond all mind
itself. This state some of the yogis call the
Amanaska, but most often they consider this to
be a state higher than the particular mind of
the individuals alone. One goes beyond all these
minds and is in direct union with the Ultimate,
beyond Mind. This is Sayujyata - complete
realization of the Ultimate State or the
Ultimate. This is perfection.
While the liberation of the lower levels only
assumes freedom from lower states, even when
such states are as high as the Parabrahmanda,
the perfection of the Realization is when one
has union with the Ultimate and becomes of its
very essence - brahmabhuta. One perhaps passes
through the status of Jivabhuta before one
attains the condition of Brahmabhuta. As Sri Ram
Chandra puts it, one has to know and become, and
then merge completely in each of the higher
states which open up at higher and higher
levels, till the final leap into the Ultimate
takes place, and one is merged in it fully so
that the Divine has opened itself up to him
because he has completely opened himself up to
the Divine. Samipya, sarupya and then sayujya
are the three steps in liberation, and each
earns a freedom that is exquisitely blissful.
However, it is the last that is sought by those
who seek union, even if it entails complete loss
of oneself and one's identity. Others rest
content with lesser status. However, if the Will
of the Ultimate entails their emergence out of
Him for His work they come out of Him, but
carrying with them the central Peace that is
infinite.
Thus divine saints are born again and again,
not because of any lack of perfection in their
essence, but because of what Sri Krsna called
divine work. (Janma karma ca me divyam: my birth
and my acts are divine). Such divinized souls
bring to the earth-consciousness a supreme
felicity and value, and transform almost the
entire universe by their radiating power. The
worlds get re-established in their true order of
being and hierarchy - true dharma, and that is
what humanity has been all along moving towards,
and aspiring to in its darkest days of
degradation, depression and disgrace.
The total divinisation of humanity is the
aspiration of many saints. Whether this is
possible or not, it is nevertheless conceivable.
But the possibility is more for individual human
beings and perhaps certain, rather than for the
whole of humanity as such, for humanity is a
genus, an idea, a convenient fiction or some
such. It is at best a plane of consciousness qua
man, and not an individual or a person aspiring
for liberation. This, of course, leads us to the
intellectual solution of the problems of the
individual, the genus or universal or concept.
Since in Yoga, as in life, we have to deal with
individuals, the entire aspiration, growth and
development or evolution belongs to individual
men confronted with the basic problems of life -
its misery, ignorance, bondage, recurrence and
rebirth, materialization or grossness and so on.
This does not mean that all individuals cannot
aspire for, and attain, the highest state of
divinization, though Sri Ram Chandra states that
there can only be one supreme personality who
directs the entire universe, and that there are
indeed several levels or offices in the cosmic
government. Probably the very notions of
liberty, equality and fraternity undergo
differentiations in connotation as the
divinising process takes place. There could
hardly be any annulment of their present
meanings, and we may not be confronted with
paradoxical counter meanings, as happens in the
field of idealistic metaphysics and political
practice.
The goal of man is verily the divine nature
and attainment of utmost peace. It is truly
Bliss and the Source of all bliss, truth and
consciousness or awareness. It is beyond all
description in terms of our human logic, nor
could it be defined by means of our terms. It is
transcendental to all our descrip-tions and
definitions, but not to our most intimate
immanental experiences, where one overcomes the
ignorance and bondage and all limitations to
free oneness with all Reality qua reality. It is
the experience of the Essence of Being which is
also the source of all existence, from the most
subtle to the most gross, from the veriest
homogeneity to the most prolific heterogeneity.
|