I was telling about the Manmatha and Gurumatha
and I emphasized that Gurumatha is good upto a
particular point and that point may be very near
the Absolute Point also. But ultimately, it is
ours to deal with the Absolute, and therefore,
we have to guide ourselves by sheer 'negation'
into the Ultimate. The practice of negation
takes a series of steps which we call the stages
in Surrender. And once we complete the act of
negation on our part to the best of our ability,
the Divine completes the task and takes us
onwards. Now the next point that is discussed
in this work is the kinds of the disciples and
the kinds of teachers that we are now having in
this world. I do not want to speak very much
about this because most of us know that there
are different types of disciples and different
types of teachers. We can generally say, 'as is
the student so is the teacher and as is the
teacher, so is the student'. We can decide that
aspirants are of four stages or four kinds as
Gita has stated: "Artharthi, Jijnasa, Jnani and
Mumukshu (seeker after liberation). Arthi is one
who is an absolutely depressed and therefore he
wants some help and he seeks God to help him.
And that is a man who is anxious to get release
from the immediate suffering. It is 'immediate
suffering' and not a very long suffering
because, our urgency comes due to its
immediateness. If a man is suffering from a
chronic disease, I think, the need for going to
a Doctor is very much minimized. Therefore, we
who suffer from long disease, ignorance and
family and so on, I think do not seek God with
that earnestness with which a man who has been
stung by a scorpion. So, as soon as that
particular distress is removed, he forgets God.
He forgets everything. So, God must be in that
particular condition of constantly inflicting
suffering to him, so that he can come to Him. It
is a soothing desire. So that is the Arthi.
There are many disciples who want wealth. May
be, economically they are bad and therefore they
require a minimum means for living. If that were
so, God is prepared to accept that also. "If you
constantly remember Me, I shall look after your
worldly-affairs" - this is what God says - "Yoga
Kshemam Vahamyaham".
But there are people who go to many of these
great Gurus or even God for the sake of becoming
millionaires and so on. They want more money,
property, more power and all the rest. Or, when
they have lost them, they want to regain them.
People who have been deposed like our princes
who were given assurances and now denied the
assurances in the name of "public will" or
"People's Will" - whoever the 'people' are such
people must really go to God. And I do not know
whether Vox populi is more than 'Vox dei'. The
will of the people is stronger than the will of
God. So, there are many people who are in that
world and most of our Gurus in the modern world
are compelled to cater to this need of their
disciples, much more that their soul's need and
hope that by fulfilling the material needs, they
will ask one day, out of the three hundred and
sixty five days, for the other one also, as a
concession to the teacher. With such people, I
think there can be no progress at all in
spirituality. I remember a particular example of
a man who came to me and asked for my help and
when I was hesitating about it, he said "I will
join your Mission, Sir". Now, that is the
Artharthi. I think nothing can be more shameful
for a Guru than that the word Guru, be agreed as
a concession for the spirituality whereas the
main thing that is wanted is materiality. This
is the most degraded doctrine.
There is a Jijnasu. Most of us are great
intellectuals. We know intellect makes us enter
into several systems, not for deciding as what
is true, but to have a common knowledge "about
all the systems. I have been there, I have been
there, I have been there ... So, I know
everything about them" - Yes. He may be a master
of knowledge. He knows nothing in particular
actually. But he has knowledge or information
about everything. So that is the Jijnasu.
Everybody is expected to have Jijnasa -
intellectual curiosity but actually not
committed to Realization.
A Jnani is one who is committed to the
decision for Realization till the experience is
over, either successfully or negatively. And Sri
Krishna says "He is the first whom I like most.
He is verily My own Self".
Master has given in the same way - the on
looker, the passive looker, the money getter,
and devout disciple. Now, we have all these
kinds. We can find out where we are. There is no
difficulty in finding out our status.
Correspondingly, we have got the Gurus. No
Guru is in Artha condition. May be some Gurus
are so needy that they are anxious for disciples
just to look after the minimum wants and they
may be attached to other people. Usually there
is competition. In ancient times, murder was
very common even with them. Sadhus killed Sadhus
very nicely, or, saw to their extinction or
extermination in the village where they lived.
So, we have got such competitive gurus. We have
also got Gurus who want to amass lots of wealth
in the name of great Mutts and so on. There are
a few Gurus who actually want to transmit
whatever knowledge or capacity they have with
them. But they might have no competence. The
anxiety may be there. It is good. It is very
much like a Jijnasa. They are anxious to help.
They know perhaps in a way. But actually they
cannot transmit. We get a first-grade man who
does this work. He knows how to transmit. He can
certainly take us by transmission. If we are
lucky to have such a teacher and we are lucky to
have enough good disciples, true Jnanis, I think
there can be perfect growth. Or else, we find
that many Missions, many Mutts, many
institutions, fall.
If the proportion of real disciples is
greater, that Institution survives, weeding out
the wrong elements. But sometimes, it so happens
that wrong elements take charge of the main
Institution. It is usually stated about Islam
that the enemies of Muhammad took charge of the
entire organization in the second generation
itself and, instead of being the simple religion
that it was in his time, it turned out to be a
very 'prosperous' religion - a religion of
conquest and so on. So, we have a lot of show,
not reality. Most religions end in show or
make-believe not in reality.
In our system, we must try our level best to
avoid the pitfalls of these gurus and disciples
and if they combine, as they do normally, the
institutions collapse. This we can study in the
history of the world. That is why, we are
expected to be devoted to the Ultimate Goal,
also, to use discrimination, constantly and
vigilantly, to watch how our own progress is
taking place. If, in an institution where the
major percent is perfect, it does not follow
that all the rung downwards and the
intermediaries are also perfect. Many of the
second hand, third-hand, and fourth grade people
are under the shadow of a great man and want to
sail under his name. We want in our system to
avoid those pitfalls. From the bottom to the top
we must see that we fulfill the purpose of
Realization which we have taken up as our Goal.
If certain centres are dormant it is because, we
have not checked up ourselves of this kind of
test about the teacher and about the disciple.
We are here to see in spiritual life the
modification of the person and taking him up
specially to make him harmonious with the
others. This harmony is very important, because
if we want a harmony of the entire universe, we
must have the harmony of every individual. If
people think that Satsang is merely a place
where we meet every week, it is no use. It is a
dynamic state in which each one is watched and
helped, without his knowing. Therefore, the Guru
has to be very vigilant, and the Abhyasi has
also to be vigilant. Then alone you will be able
to find out where we are developing in this
system. That is why in the last chapter we have
taken up the question of levels of our approach.
One more point I would like to mention:
"Transmission" as stated in our system, it is a
unique phenomenon. Master has stated that many
Gurus do not know what Transmission is. The only
transmission they know is the transmission from
word of mouth-certain literature, certain
Mantra. That is a kind of traditional knowledge
transmitted from mouth or from mouth to ear and
from ear to mouth. That particular continuity is
called transmission. Now, this has been taking
place in our country and every other country.
That is knowledge in transmission. Heredity is
also transmitted. We use transmission there
also.
But what is the transmission that we are
doing? This transmission is of the Highest or
the Divine Mind, without any diminution or
adulteration, into the men and for the one
purpose of finally replacing our mind with That
Mind. In other words, our mind is dragged slowly
into the Highest Mind. First, the Highest Mind
goes on doing the work of the lower mind,
keeping slowly modified its entire functions.
This activity of transmission is unknown to the
teachers of several religions. Therefore, the
quality of the teacher must be of the order that
he can and in fact does and not merely hope to
introduce into the heart the Supreme Force. You
can recognize that it is Supreme by one or two
tests which every disciple has to make. The
Gurus have to test the disciples and the
disciples have also to test the Gurus. And, in
fact, we do. There is no question of doubt about
it. We test every doctor to get information
about him, so we gather our information before
we risk ourselves to a doctor. And we take some
caution or precaution when we go to Guru and it
is good.
Now, what is the test of transmission. First
thing is, there is a Detension (de-tension). I
used to say that the tension condition is
removed, whatever the tension be. The tension
may be physical or sexual or even moral tension.
Those tensions are removed or rather laid down,
calmed. Now, the second thing that we experience
is a positive calmness that is coming into us.
Even in a lot of noise and a lot of disturbance,
we feel calm. The third test is when we go on
doing our work and yet find that we are getting
transmission. And we can always demand, not only
at certain times i.e., the Master is
continuously 'committed' to the disciple's work
in this system. A Guru who is just so called,
initiates disciples and there upon forgets him
after that till the next round of visit, is not
a Master at all. A Master is a Constant
Companion of the Soul.
Two birds which are inseparable, are sitting
on the same tree, one eating the fruit and the
other looking on like that, when we are enjoying
the world, and the Divine looks on. But here, I
want to compare these two to the Master and the
disciple. The disciple is permitted to eat and
made to realize that he is doing it only by the
support and guidance of the Master, till finally
he comes to the very same condition of the
Master, when he begins to go on merging in the
Master rather than the fruits of the worlds.
That is constant watch, vigilance. That is why
some of us can experience even at moments when
Master is not with us suddenly we are reminded.
He is with us. If this could be constant and
continuous for improving us to the Highest
levels, not merely saving our body or saving
something else but carrying us on the Dhyana and
"super-Dhyana", we will find that He is the real
Guru. But such a Guru is very difficult to get,
as I told. It is our good fortune to have Shri
Ram Chandraji with us. But, should we not give
Him the happiness of being good disciples? Now
that is our condition. That is why Master is
interested in saying that we are to be worthy of
our Master. In the history of the world, only a
few people are being worthy of their Masters.
That is why Sri Krishna had to say: "Of the many
people, there are hardly a few who want to be
Jijnasu, and amongst them, there are hardly a
few who seek Me. They seek other people rather.
But even amongst that handful of people there is
hardly one who wants to know Me as I am in
Myself. They want Me for their purposes". They
say: "I want you to come in this form". The
Gopis wanted Him in His beautiful form and they
wanted Him in that form. Somebody wanted Him as
a warrior and a third person wanted Him as a
charioteer. But nobody wants God as a God. "What
is that You want of Me?" I would like to say
that such person who says "What is it that you
want of me?" Is a greater disciple and is the
best one. That is why in Kathopanishad it is
beautifully stated "When my father offers me to
Yama, what does Yama want of me?" He has no need
of anything in this world. What does He want of
me? Of what use my going to Him?" And when he
was asked "what you would like to know", he
said, "I would like to know what you are in
yourself?" Now that is the way of approach. I
would like to know Him in his infinite and not
in his finite. Our modern religions are
inverted. All bhaktas have inverted with very
best of intentions. They want God to be in their
ways and demand that God should oblige them and
His greatness is being made finite. Now, I
consider that is reversal of the entire
spirituality.
So, I only pray that we should be worthy of
the Master and try to know the Master as He is
himself and it is not such an impossible thing
as some people try to say. It is the most easy
thing to know the Master in Himself. But we are
very much interested in the relationship of God
as between us and Himself rather than the
Master.
|