Sri Ramanuja
in the very
opening
verse of his
Sri Bhasya
expressed
the content
and function
of bhakti by
revealing it
al the form
of semusi: "semusi
bhakti-rupa".
Semusi as
essential
knowledge of
the Divine
takes the
form of
devotion to
the Ultimate
form of
Brahman as
Sri-nivasa
the abode of
Sreyas, the
freedom and
liberation
personified
as the
Divine
Mother. Sri
Vedanta
Desika in
his Sri-stuti
spoke of the
Sri as Sreyo
murtih, thus
confirming
the view of
the
Kathopanishad
that the
Ultimate
Lord shows
the path of
Sreyas not
preyas.
The Divine
to be
worshipped
must be one
who grants
this supreme
state of
liberation
and
immortality
and absolute
santi which
even the
lighting of
the
Nachiketa
fire cannot
grant. Thus
the devotion
to the
paramapurusa
spoken of in
the
Srutis--Brahman
as the
dwelling
place of
Sreyas—Lord
Narayana--Vishnu—is
bhakti.
1
*
Reference:
Srimad
Rahasyatrayasara,
Tatparya
Chandrika,
etc..
Bhakti is
capable of
being given
to the
Purusottama
in his murta
or amurta
forms; the
former are
obviously
the Archa
and the
Vibhava,
whereas the
amurta forms
are the
Antaryami or
Harda and
Vyuha and
Para. Though
to certain
persons
forms of the
transcendental
order were
revealed yet
generally
they have
been
conceded as
amurta. The
Divine Lord
in both
these forms
is saguna
not nirguna.
He has the
supreme
perfect
qualities
which are
infinite in
number.
Those
qualities
are such as
remove or
abolish the
evil and
imperfections
on the one
hand and on
the other
grant
supreme
felicities
to the
devotee;
Heyapratyanika
and
supremely
subhasraya.
Bhakti can
be sadvaraka
or
Advaraka--through
or direct,
mediated or
unmediated.
One may
develop the
association
with God
through any
other means
or persons
or may gain
it without
mediation.
This point
is clearly
further
elucidated
when Sri
Vedanta
Desika
affirms that
Bhakti can
be practiced
directly by
oneself
(when, of
course, any
other person
or guru is
not
available or
unwilling)
or through
the
mediation of
an eminently
qualified
acharya
(acharyanishta)
Similarly
bhakti can
be utilized
as a
subsidiary
(anga) to
the other
yogas like
Jnana or
karma or
this can be
the angi and
they could
be made
angas of
this bhakti.
Sri Vedanta
Desika
reveals an
acute
understanding-
of the
interdependence
of the three
modes of
human
consciousness,
cognition,
conation and
affection.
He reveals
however that
the other
two modes
culminate
and find
fulfilment
in Bhakti
(supreme
devotion to
God).
Even
prapatti or
Sharanagati
is shown to
be an anga
of bhakti
though again
with an
acute
psychological
understanding
Sri Vedanta
Desika
points out
that
prapatti can
become the
end of those
yogas, for
human effort
cannot avail
and
surrender is
necessary to
gain the
grace of
God.
Prapatti at
the
beginning
need not
have
devotion but
that becomes
added to it
when the
Divine
answers to
the
sharanagati.
This is
resulting
bhakti
(phala-bhakti)
arising
spontaneously
from the
experience
of the grace
of God. This
may occur
not only
from the
prapatti-experience
but also
from the
karma or
jnana also.
Devotion can
arise in
almost every
way as the
usual
ordinary
course of
bhakti-sadhana
followed by
the
Bhagavata,
Narada and
Shandilya
schools
show, and
might be
expressed in
all ways of
human
relationships,
dramatized
in the life
as if of
reminiscence.
The alvars
had revelled
in the
popular mode
of Bhakti
sadhana.
Kulasekhara
is a supreme
example.
More
spontaneous
and less
schematized
have been
the bhakti
of the other
Alvars.
Though Sri
Vedanta
Desika fully
participated
in this, his
bhakti is
more of the
'amour
intellectus'
philosophical
love or
platonic
love. His
love was
refined and
sublimated
and fully
conformed to
the view
expressed by
Sri Ramanuja
as semushi
bhakti.
Further this
semushi
bhakti can
only arise
when one has
not merely
realized
oneself as
the sesha of
God but as
the body of
God
(sarira-bhava).
Sri Vedanta
Desika
emphatically
stated2
that the
differentiating
doctrine of
Visistadvaita
is
'Sariri-sarira
sambandha
between God
and the
soul. May
that mean
anything
more than or
less than
living and
moving and
having one's
being in the
Parama
Purusottama!
It is true
that Sri
Ramanuja and
Sri Vedanta
Desika did
not wish
sarira to be
understood
in the sense
of
Naiyayikas
or
Vaisesikas
or even
other
systems have
maintained,
but as that
which the
Divine
supports,
destines and
enjoys for
His own
purposes.
This
definition
applies
equally to
Prakriti or
Nature
('achit').
The
karmasarira
of man is
only
partially
under the
control
support and
enjoyment.
Therefore it
is that one
must seek
the real
sariri and
depend upon
Him, rather
than on his
own sarira
or on
himself.
This is
invaluable
for
realisation.
Above all
bhakti is
not a
philosophy
but a way of
living in
God, for God
and by God.
Sri Vedanta
Desika wrote
voluminously
to impress
on all
aspirants
for the
highest
Sreyas or
nissreyas,
the
necessity to
practice
god-devotion
in the
fullest
spirit that
one is the
body of God,
living and
moving and
having his
being in God
and not
merely a
temple. The
Sarira·Bhava
had helped
Sri Vedanta
Desika to
emphasize
the
panchakala-parayanata
of the
ekantins or
parama-ekantins,
giving a
secondary
place to the
symbolisms
of the
temple. Sri
Vedanta
Desika
synthesized
all the
various
currents of
spiritual
devotion and
ordered them
in such a
way as to
deny none
their
legitimate
place. For
Himself
however he
liked the
'amour
intellectus
dei’.
This is a
truth we
have tended
to forget
during the
past seven
centuries.
May this
spirit be
revived.